GURTEJ SINGH ALIAS AMARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/16525/2025 · 2025-05-22
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37457 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37457 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
261 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
GURTEJ SINGH ALIAS AMARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. HARPREET SINGH BRAR
1. This Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of DDR No.43 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149/325 of IPC (Annexure P FIR No.26 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IP 325 of IPC added later Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under Sections 148/323/325/149 of IPC) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise
2. The following order was passed on 26.03.2025 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURTEJ SINGH ALIAS AMARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS
V/S PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Neha Bindal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of DDR No.43 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149/325 of IPC (Annexure P FIR No.26 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IP 325 of IPC added later on) (Annexure P-1) registered at Police Station Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under Sections 148/323/325/149 of IPC) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P The following order was passed on 26.03.2025 :
“This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of DDR No.43 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149/325 of IPC (Annexure P 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC (Section 325 of IPC added lateron) (Annexure P Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under Sections 148/323/325/149 of IPC) along with all subsequent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16525-2025 Date of decision: 22.05.2025 GURTEJ SINGH ALIAS AMARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS
...PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Advocate for the petitioners. petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of DDR No.43 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149/325 of IPC (Annexure P-2) in FIR No.26 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC (Section 1) registered at Police Station Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under Sections 148/323/325/149 of IPC) along with all subsequent proceedings arising dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-3).
The following order was passed on 26.03.2025 :- This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of DDR No.43 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 325 of IPC (Annexure P-2) in FIR No.26 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC (Section 325 of IPC added lateron) (Annexure P-1) registered at Police Station Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under of IPC) along with all subsequent
MANISHA 2025.05.23 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this
order/judgment
CRM-M-16525
3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and 324/323/148/149/325 of under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC (Section 325 of IPC added later 16525-2025 2 proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 20.01.2025 (Annexure P-3). Notice of motion for 28.04.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab accepts notice No.1-State. Copy of the paper book be supplied to him during the course of day. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to secure the presence of respondents No.2 & 3 before the learned trial Court at the time of recording th
In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the rties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shak Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs.
State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 is allowed and DDR No.43 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149/325 of IPC (Annexure P-2) in FIR No.26 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC (Section 325 of IPC added later proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated Notice of motion for 28.04.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent State. Copy of the paper book be supplied to him during the course of day. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to secure the presence of respondents No.2 & 3 before the learned trial Court at the time of recording the statement. In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding ompromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the rties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition DDR No.43 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 2) in FIR No.26 dated 27.02.2019 under Sections 324/323/148/149 of IPC (Section 325 of IPC added later on)
MANISHA 2025.05.23 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this
order/judgment
CRM-M-16525
(Annexure P-1) registered at Police Station Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under Sections 148/323/325/149 of IP consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the petitioners.
May 22, 2025 manisha
(i)
(ii) 16525-2025 3 1) registered at Police Station Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under Sections 148/323/325/149 of IP consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable
1) registered at Police Station Kotbhai, District Sri Muktsar Sahib (charges framed under Sections 148/323/325/149 of IPC) and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the HARPREET SINGH BRAR)
JUDGE
Yes/No
Yes/No
MANISHA 2025.05.23 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this
order/judgment