Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37456 (MAD)

VIJI @ VIJAYAKUMAR v. THE STATE REP. BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL OP/8549/2025 · 2025-03-24

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.8549 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 8549 of 2025 Viji @ Vijayakumar ..... Petitioner Vs The State by The Inspector of Police, Hasthampatti Police Station, Salem City. ..... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and to set-aside the order dated 24.01.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.419 of 2024 in S.C.No.58 of 2013 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Anandan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 24.01.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.419 of 2024 in S.C.No.58 of 2013 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Salem, thereby dismissing the petition filed to re-call P.W.3 for further cross https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.8549 of 2025 examination. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. It is seen that the petitioner is arrayed as A12 in S.C.No.58 of 2013 and is facing trial for the offences under Sections 148, 302 r/w 149, 324 of IPC. So far, the prosecution had examined 18 witnesses out of 28 witnesses and the case is now posted for the evidence of the Investigating Officer. At this juncture, the petitioner has filed a petition seeking to recall P.W.3 for further cross examination. It is pertinent to note that P.W.3 has already been cross examined and once again the petitioner filed an application to recall P.W.3 for further cross examination. The trial pertains to the year 2013 and the matter is now posted for Investigating Officer's evidence. Therefore, this petition has been filed only to drag the proceedings and nothing else. 4. In view of the above, the Trial Court has rightly dismissed the petition filed under Section 311 of Cr.P.C and this Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.8549 of 2025 finds no infirmity or illegality in the order dated 24.01.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.419 of 2024 in S.C.No.58 of 2013 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Salem. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 24.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1. The II Additional District Judge, Salem. 2.The Inspector of Police, Hasthampatti Police Station, Salem City. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.8549 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Lpp Crl.O.P.No.8549 of 2025 24.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis