Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37449 (AP)

THE KURNOOL MUN. CORP. KURNOOL DIST & 1 OTHER v. C.V. NARAYANA REDDY, KURNOOL DIST

AS/678/2017 · 2025-08-28

V Srinivas

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010640422017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS FIRST APPEAL NO: 678/2017 Between: 1. THE KURNOOL MUN. CORP. KURNOOL DIST & 1 OTHER, KUMOOL REPRESENTED BY ITSCOMMISIONER,KUMOOL. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KURNOOL. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. C V NARAYANA REDDY KURNOOL DIST, S/o C.P.Veera Reddy Aged about 39 years, Hindu, Contractor, Resident of Flat No.101, Brundavan Arcade, Chanikyapuri Colony, A- Camp, Kurnool. ...RESPONDENT to allow the appeal with costs throughout and to set aside the decree and judgment dated 17-03-2017 passed by the lower court in O.S. No. 12/2012. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP 1657 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the execution of the decree and judgment dt. 17.03.2017 S.V,J A.S.No.678 of 2017 passed by the Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Kurnool in OS.NO. 12 of 2012 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order of stay of execution dated 19-12-2017 passed in (ASMP No. 1657 of 2017) IA 1 of 2017 and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. SC FOR MC RAYALSEEMA 2. S D GOWD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA The Court made the following: S.V,J A.S.No.678 of 2017 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT No.678 of 2017 JUDGMENT: On 19.08.2025, this Court passed the following order:- On the other day i.e., on 01.08.2025, this Court passed the following order:- “On perusal of the proceeding sheets, it is observed that there was no representation on behalf of the appellants during the last several adjournments. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Since the matter is listed after a long time, one more opportunity is given to the appellants to get ready with the matter by the next date of hearing, failing which, the matter will be disposed of in accordance with law. Sri T. Ashok Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent is present and insists for disposal. List the matter on 19.08.2025 under the caption for ‘final hearing’.” Even today also none appeared for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent is present and insisted for disposal. Hence, list the matter on 29.08.2025, under the caption „for dismissal‟. 2. Even today also none appeared for the appellant. 3. Therefore, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 29.08.2025 JLV