Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37445 (RAJ)

VAKIL S/O NURU @ NOOR MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12914/2025 · 2025-10-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42406] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12914/2025 Vakil S/o Nuru @ Noor Mohammad, aged about 41 Years, R/o Village Jhhatali, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg (Raj.) (The Accused- Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail, Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma Ms. Chanchal Mr. Uttkarsh Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP Mr. Ankit Khandelwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 205/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg wherein he has been charged for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333 and 74 of BNS, 2023 and subsequently he has been charged for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the statement of the injured-Sajid, the grievous injury on his neck caused by an axe has been inflicted by the accused-Ashiq and common general allegations have been levelled against the petitioner and co- accused persons namely Raja Mohammad and Mohin to whom indulgence of bail has already been granted by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.09.2025 in S.B. Criminal [2025:RJ-JP:42406] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12914/2025] Misc. Bail Application No. 11875/2025. Counsel submits that the investigation is almost complete. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application. 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that co-accused persons namely Raja Mohammad and Mohin have already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Vakil S/o Nuru @ Noor Mohammad arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/263