206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15945-2025 Date of decision: 09.04.2025 SUKHWINDER SINGH ALIAS SUKHA ….PETITIONER(S) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG, Punjab. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurdeep, has apprised that the petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the petitioner having already been arrested in the case on 08.04.2025. 2. Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner nor any representation has been made on his behalf. 3. Hence, petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 09.04.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.04.11 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment