Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37438 (RAJ)

YADAV BRICKS COMPANY ROADWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10887/2025 · 2025-07-22

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27402] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10887/2025 Yadav Bricks Company Roadwal, Through Its Proprietor Virendra Kumar S/o Shri Sumer Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Jadthal, Tehsil Dhruheda, District Rewari, District Harayana. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Alwar (Old), New District Kotputli Behror. 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Neemrana, District Alwar, New District Kotaputli-Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this petition was considered and decided by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order/judgment dated 07.05.2018 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19083/2017: M/s. Saubhagh Bricks Through Sole Proprietor Smt. Saubhagh D/o Khoobi Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Learned counsel further submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file representation. Permission sought for is granted. [2025:RJ-JP:27402] (2 of 2) [CW-10887/2025] In light of the observations/directions passed in order dated 07.05.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19083/2017, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. If any representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today, the authority concerned is directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of representation as well as certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not passed any observation on the merits of the case and thus, authority concerned shall decide the representation in accordance with law without being influenced or prejudiced by this order. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /101