Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37437 (RAJ)

PHOOL CHAND VERMA S/O SH FATEH CHAND VERMA v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE COPERTAIVE BANK LTD.

CW/17153/2025 · 2025-11-12

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45363] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17153/2025 Phool Chand Verma S/o Sh Fateh Chand Verma, aged about 75 Years, R/o Plot No. 145, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus The Rajasthan State Copertaive Bank Ltd., Opposite Nehru Bal Udhyan, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan through General Manager. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 12/11/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a limited prayer for issuance of directions to the learned Rent Tribunal No. 1, Jaipur to decide the eviction petition No.27/2025 titled as 'Phool Chand Verma v. The Rajasthan State Coperative Bank Ltd.' within a period of three months or to be tried on day to day basis. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 75 years, and is suffering from various Neurological and Cardiovascular ailments as evident from Annexure-1. He further submits that recently the petitioner has also suffered a fracture left neck of femur with abductor tendon avulsion. He also submits that the petitioner is on his death bed and his health is deteriorating day by day. It is also contended by the learned counsel that the respondent has been adopting dilatory tactics with the intention to prolong the proceedings as initially the respondent did not appear before the learned Tribunal [2025:RJ-JP:45363] (2 of 2) [CW-17153/2025] and when ex parte proceedings were drawn against the respondent, an application under Order 9 Rule 7 of the CPC was filed to set aside the ex parte proceedings. Therefore, he prays that the disposal of the eviction petition No.27/2025 may kindly be expedited. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material available on record. 4. In view of the peculiar facts of the case, more particularly, that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 75 years, is suffering from Neurological and Cardiovascular ailments and is on his death bed with his health deteriorating day by day; it is expected from the learned Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending eviction petition expeditiously, it is also expected that the learned Rent Tribunal will not entertain unnecessary and unwarranted requests for adjournment. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the present civil writ petition is disposed of. 6. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-2