Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37436 (AP)

Marukurthi Subba Lakshmi, v. SRI AJAY JAIN IAS

CC/6844/2023 · 2025-08-20

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010638922023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6844/2023 Between: 1. MARUKURTHI SUBBA LAKSHMI,, W/O. SRINU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 1-67, B.C COLONY, PRAKASARAO PALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. AYYANKI LAKSHMI,, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3-22, KOTTAPETA, PRAKASARAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. BUSANABOYINA NAGAMANI,, W/O. SIVA SANKARA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 3-45, KOTHA PETA, NALLAJERLA MANDAL. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. ADDALA VENKATA LAXMI,, W/O. VENKATESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-54, RAMALAYAM VEEDI, ACHANTAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. HANUMANTHHU LAKSHMI,, W/O. RAMBABU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-44, PRAKASARAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. NUKELLI JOYTHI,, W/O. GNANESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 4-151, B.C. COLONY, PRAKASRAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. PITHANI VENKATA RAMANA,, W/O. VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-89, KOTHAPETA, PRAKASRAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. NUKELLI SRINIVASARAO,, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA RAO, AGED, ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-53, B.C. COLONY, PRAKASRAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. UNNAMATTLA POSAMMA,, W/O. GANGAYYA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-1, RAMALAYAM VEEDHI, ACHANTAPALEM, NALLAJERLLA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. AWARI VARA LAKSHMI,, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-39, MAIN ROAD, PRAKASARAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 11. SOMA GANGA RATNAM,, W/O. BUCHIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 5-39, MAIN ROAD, PRAKASARAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 12. KOMMIREDDY NAGAMANI,, W/O. VENKATESWARAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-12, KOTTAPETA, ACAPADU, EAST GODAVRI DISTRICT. 13. PERAM VEERAMMA,, W/O. PEDDA VENKATESWARAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-36, KRISHNA TEMPLE, PRAKASARAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 14. GUDISETTI MANGA,, W/O. ANJAYYA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1-73, BC COLONY, PRAKASARAOPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI AJAY JAIN IAS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SAMSHER SINGH RAWAT I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DR K MADHAVI LATHA I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. N BHARAT GUPTHA, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION (APSHCL), VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 5. G PARASURAM, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR - CUM - EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION (APSHCL), NALLAJERLA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 and 12 of contempt of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 21828/2023 dated 30.08.2023 by His Lordship Sri Justice RAVI CHEEMALAPATI and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. POOJITHA PAREPALLI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. VENKATA JAGANNADHA RAO E 3. C SUMON The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 13.08.2023 passed in W.P.No.21828 of 2023. 2. On 17.07.2025, there is no representation for the petitioners. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Sri R.Kalyan Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the respondents on instructions dated 22.07.2024 submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with and the amounts were credited to the bank accounts of the petitioners, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. The said instructions are placed on record. 4. Taking his submissions into consideration, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS