Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37435 (JHR)

ANIS ANSARI ALIAS ANIS AKHTAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7172/2025 · 2025-12-17

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:37892 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7172 of 2025 1. Anis Ansari @ Anis Akhtar, aged about 30 years, son of Md. Sohail Ansari, resident of Guli Bhatta, P.O. Sahibganj, P.S. Sahibganj (T), District-Sahibganj (Jharkhand) 2. Md. Iqbal Ali, aged about 43 years, son of Anwar Ali, resident of L.c. Road, P.O. Sahibganj, P.S. Sahibganj (T), District-Sahibganj, Jharkhand 3. Asif @ Md. Asif Alam @ Md. Asif aged about 23 years, son of late Matru @ Md. Kursid Alam, resident of Guli Bhatta, Panchmore, P.O. Sahibganj, P.S. Sahibganj (T), District-Sahibganj (Jharkhand) ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Ashish Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P. 02/ 17.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sahibganj (T) P.S. Case No.101 of 2025, for offence registered under section 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 303(2) of the BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners are resident of nearby place where the alleged occurrence has said to be occurred. He further submits in view of that there is possibility that the petitioner has been noticed in the CCTV Camera and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 13 of the petitioner and he also submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. He then submits that co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.6914 of 2025 and A.B.A. No. 7068 of 2025. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that the informant has also received injury. 5. Considering that the said occurrence is said to be during the ( 2025:JHHC:37892 ) Moharram procession and it was pointed out that the petitioners are resident of nearby area and they have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 13 of the petition and co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.As, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners. 6. Accordingly, petitioners, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of their surrender/arrest, petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Sahibganj, in connection with Sahibganj (T) P.S. Case No.101 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Dt.17.12.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-