Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(111)
CRR-652-2007 (O&M) Decided on : 25.04.2025 Harvinder Singh ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another
……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Addl. AG, Haryana.
Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for respondent No.2.
***** Sumeet Goel (Oral):
1.
A perusal of the zimni orders dated 18.04.2023, 11.03.2024 as also 17.09.2024 indicate that no appearance had been caused on behalf of the petitioner. On the last date of hearing i.e. 17.09.2024 intimation was directed to be sent to learned counsel for the petitioner. As per office note, the same has been done. Even today, none has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
2.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
3.
Registry is directed to send a copy of the order passed today to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hisar for requisite compliance.
(SUMEET GOEL) April 25, 2025
JUDGE Naveen
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.04.25 15:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh