Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37428 (RAJ)

AMRESH S/O RAMKISHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8719/2025 · 2025-10-14

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41805] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8719/2025 Amresh S/o Ramkishan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Idgah Road Premnagar Colony Dholpur, Police Station Kotwali District Dholpur. ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.651/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Dholpur District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) of BNS and Sections 29, 51 of Wild Animal Protection Act and Section 41, 42 of Rajasthan Forest Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is submitted that applicant has only one criminal antecedents. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has stoutly opposed the anticipatory bail application and has submitted that, according to the factual report dated 08.10.2025, the applicant has five criminal antecedents registered against him, which were suppressed by the counsel for the applicant before the learned Trial Court and the present Court. [2025:RJ-JP:41805] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8719/2025] 4. Heard and considered the matter. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned Public Prosecutor and the fact that the counsel has suppressed the criminal antecedents of the applicant, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present bail application with cost of Rs. 50,000/-, to be deposited in favor of Deputy Commissioner of Police, HQ, Zila Police Welfare Fund Jaipur, (Account Number: 61045301105, IFSC Code: SBIN0031026), within an upper limit of one month, from the date of passing of this order. 6. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed. 7. It is made clear that if there is non-compliance of the aforementioned direction, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to carry forward proceedings, to get compliance of the said direction. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /255