M/S.S.R.COUNTY A PARTNERSHIP FIRM & ANOTHER v. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
WA/1128/2010 · 2025-06-23
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37427 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37427 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010639472010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1128/2010 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dt. 05.07.2010 in WP No. 26146 of 2008 on the file of the High Court. Between; 1.M/S S R County, a partnership firm, 9-1-45, F3, Girija Residency, New Resapuvanipale, Visakhapatnam -13, rep. by its Managing Partner.
2. M/s. Siri Venkateswara Real Estates and Developers, A Partnership Firm, 8-2-32, PANthulugari Meda, Patta Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam-2 6. rep. by its Managing Partner. ...APPELLANTS AND Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam rep. by its Vice Chairman. ...RESPONDENT lA NO; 1 OF 2010(WAMP 2502 OF 20101 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the common Judgment dated 05.07.2010 in WP.No.24146 of 2008 pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. to
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI G SAI NARAYANA RAO REPRESENTING SRI HARI SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent: SRI SOMISETTY GANESH BABU (SC FOR VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
APHC010639472010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-1 [3483] WRIT APPEAL NO: 1128 of 2010 M/s.S. R. County, a Partnership Firm and another ...Appellants Vs. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority ...Respondent Advocate for appellants Sri G. Sai Narayana Rao representing Sri Hari Sreedhar Sri Somisetty Ganesh Babu, learned Standing Counsel for Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority. Advocate for respondent
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 24th June 2025 PC :
Learned counsel for the parties state that the present Writ Appeal be disposed of in terms of the judgment and order dated 28.08.2015 passed in W.A.No.702 of 2010 and batch which covers the issues that arise in the present writ appeal. can
2. Be that as it may, the present Writ Appeal is disposed of on terms similar as W.A.No.702 of 2010 and batch dated 28.08.2015. No costs.
0 2 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. The Vice Chairman, Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam. One CC to Sri Hah Sreedhar, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Somisetty Ganesh Babu (SC for VUDA) Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies
2.
3.
4. TF
HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025
JUDGMENT WA 1128/2010 0 2 JUL 2025 O' Sectigpx^y DISPOSING OF THE W.R., WITHOUT COSTS