[2025:RJ-JP:29221] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 332/2000 1. Mst Narayani Devi D/o Sh. Pratap, R/o Village Chomu, District Jaipur 1/1 Laxmi Devi W/o Gopal Lal Sharma R/o Ram Nagar Sodala, Jaipur Rajasthan. 1/2 Kamla Devi W/o Ram Gopal Sharma, R/o Dehakri Dhani Kahnipura Tehsil Chomu, Jaipur Rajasthan. 1/3Mohini Devi W/o Late Hanuman Prasad Sharma, R/o Ramnagar Ginoi Tehsil Chomu, Jaipur Rajasthan. 1/4 Radha Devi W/o Prabhu Dayal Sharma, R/o Ram Nagar Ghinoi, Tehsil Chomu, Jaipur Rajasthan. 1/5 Prem Devi W/o Shankar Lal Sharma, R/o Balaki Dhani Labaana Manpur, Jaipur Rajasthan. 1/6 Anita Sharma W/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, R/o Tehsil Chomu near Sabji Mandi Road, Chomu, Jaipur Rajasthan. 1/7 Jagdish Prasad Sharma S/o Late Radha Kishan Sharma, R/o Chomu near Jaivilas Garden Bhojlava, Chomu, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Defendants-Appellants Versus Arpana Gupta W/o Sh. Rajveer Arya, R/o Village Chomu, District Jaipur ----Plaintiff-Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abhi Goyal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 31/07/2025 : The present first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the appellants-defendants against the impugned judgment & decree dt.29.09.2000 passed by the Court of ld. District Judge, Jaipur District Jaipur, in Civil Suit No.69/1994, whereby the suit instituted by the plaintiff-respondent for specific performance of contract & permanent injunction, was decreed. [2025:RJ-JP:29221] (2 of 3) [CFA-332/2000] Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that both the parties have settled their dispute amicably and a compromise has been arrived at between them. It is further submitted that in compliance of the order dt.30.07.2025 passed by this Court, the appellant No/1/7, namely Jagdish Prasad Sharma (legal heir) & the sole respondent (Arpana Gupta) have appeared before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court for verification of compromise & identified by their Counsel. The appellant Nos.1/1 to 1/6 have not appeared but the power-of-attorney has been filed on their behalf. Registrar (Judicial) has verified the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties and submitted his report. The parties are also agreed to comply with the terms & conditions of aforesaid compromise. Therefore, both the parties have requested the Court to pass an appropriate order for disposal of the first appeal in terms of compromise. In this regard, an application bearing Inward No.1/2025 dt.29.07.2025 has also been filed by the appellants praying therein that while taking on record the aforesaid compromise, the present appeal may be disposed of in terms of compromise and the decree be prepared accordingly. For the reasons & grounds mentioned therein, the application is allowed. The compromise is taken on record. Heard. Perused. As per compromise dt.28.07.2025, both the parties do not want to pursue the matter & the disputes between them have been settled amicably. Further, they agreed to decide/withdraw the civil suit/appeal itself while setting aside the judgment & decree dt.29.09.2000 passed by the ld. trial Court in terms of compromise. In view of above, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties. [2025:RJ-JP:29221] (3 of 3) [CFA-332/2000] Consequently, impugned judgment & decree dt.29.07.2000 is set-aside. The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise. The decree be drawn up accordingly. The terms of the compromise shall be treated as an integral part of this order. The stay application & other pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J. ashok-SAURABH /107