IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 19796/2025 Decided on: 19.12.2025 Rajeev Kumar …Petitioner Versus Registrar, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Rajat Kumar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 05.04.2024 (Annexure P-5), seeking applicability of Mr. Ishwar Dyal Vs. Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry Nauni2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2CWP No. 4469 of 2022, decided a/w connected matters on 25.09.2023 2 the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned vice counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 19th December, 2025(rohit)