APHC010638792023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6845/2023 Between: 1. VADAVALLI KANAKALAKSHMI, W/O. V. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 2-133, CHODIMELLA, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 2. VADAVALLI NARSIMHAMURTHY, , S/O. V. VENKATESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-133, CHODIMELLA, CHODIMELLA, ELURU DISTRICT. 3. KAMIREDDY JOYTIRMAYI, , W/O. KAMIREDDY ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 5-14, KOTHURU, POTHUNURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. BOTTA SWATHA DEVI, , W/O. BOTTA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-46, RAMALAYAM STREET, NAGULAGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. GAVARA MANI KUMARI,, W/O. NAGA VENKATA SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 2-64 BANK STREET, TIRUPATHIPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. PRAGADA SUBBALAKSHMI,, W/O. P. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-46/1, CHURCH VEEDHI, TRIUPATIPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. TOLETI SATYANARAYANA, , S/O. TOLETI APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-125, CHINTALA ANKA STREET, TIRUPATIPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. BALE LAKSHMI,, W/O. BALE GANGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 52 EARS, R/O. M.M PURAM, PULLA, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 9. BOMMANABOYINA SATYAVATHI, W/O. B. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. M.M PURAM, PULLA, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 10. MOKAMATLA DHANALAKSHMI,, W/O. MOKAMATLA YESUBABU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 13-48, M.M. PURAM, PULLA, PULLA, ELURU DISTRICT. 11. MUDDAM TULASAMMA,, W/O. M. NAGESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 17-45, M.M. PURAM, PULLA, PULLA, ELURU DISTRICT. 12. MULAKALA NAGAMALLESWARI,, W/O. M. KRISHNA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-167, M.M. PURAM, PULLA, PULLA, ELURU DISTRICT. 13. TADI RANGANAYAKAMMA,, W/O. TADI PEDAKAPU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 17-55-3, M.M. PURAM, PULLA, PULLA, ELURU DISTRICT. 14. BALE SESHAMANI, , W/O. BALE VISHNUMURTHI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 15-88-1-2, M.M. PURAM, PULLA, PULLA, ELURU ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI AJAY JAIN IAS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SAMSHER SINGH RAWAT I A S, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. N BHARAT GUPTHA, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION (APSHCL), VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. K S R RAVI KUMAR, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION (APSHCL), ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. C V ANANDHA KUMAR, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION (APSHCL), ATTILI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. SRI PRASANNA VENKATESH I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 7. P PRASANTHI I A S, , THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 8. D RAMA KANTHA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION (APSHCL), ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 9. K VENUGOPAL, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION (APSHCL), ATTILI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 and 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 21825/2023 dated 30.08.2023 by His Lordship Sri Justice RAVI CHEEMALAPATI and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. POOJITHA PAREPALLI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. VENKATA JAGANNADHA RAO E 3. C SUMON The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 13.08.2023 passed in W.P.No.21825 of 2023. 2. On 17.07.2025, there is no representation for the petitioners. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Sri R.Kalyan Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the respondents on instructions dated 22.07.2024 submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with and the amounts were credited to the bank accounts of the petitioners, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. The said instructions are placed on record. 4. Taking his submissions into consideration, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS