Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37414 (HP)

Jagdish Chand v. Shanta Kumari

CMP.M/1237/2025 · 2025-11-13

Romesh Verma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Jagdish Chand vs. Shanta Kumari CMP.M. No.1237of 2025 13.11.2025 Present : Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the appellant/applicant. Mr. Rocky, Advocate vice Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP.M. No.1237of 2025 This application has been filed for condonation of delay of 88 days in filing the appeal. Though reply has not been filed, but application has been opposed by learned counsel for respondent on the ground that day- to-day delay, as required to be explained under law, has not been explained. Learned counsel for the applicant has justified the delay on the basis of averments made in the application. Considering the averments made in the application and submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the delay of 88 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands allowed and disposed of. FAO(FC) No.____ of 2025 [FAO(FC) ST-27476 of 2025] Be registered. Power of attorney on behalf of respondent, stated to have been filed by Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, is not on record. Be taken on record after removal of objections, if any. Record be requisitioned. List for consideration on 17.12.2025. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Romesh Verma) Judge 13th November, 2025 (Pardeep)