IBRAHIM SHIRAJSAB KOUJALAGI v. ANAND MAHALINGAPPA DALAL,
MFA/21555/2012 · 2025-09-17
Ashok S Kinagi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37412 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37412 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12338 MFA No. 21555 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 21555 OF 2012 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI. IBRAHIM SHIRAJSAB KOUJALAGI AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: NOW NIL, R/O. MAHALINGPUR, TQ : MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT, NOW R/A. NAGARMUNNOLI, TQ : CHIKODI, DIST : BELGAUM. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SANTOSH S HATTIKATAGI, ADV) AND:
1.
SHRI. ANAND MAHALINGAPPA DALAL, AGE : MAJOR, OCC : BUSINESS, R/O. BASAVANAGAR MAHALINGAPUR TQ : MUDHOL, DIST : BAGALKOT.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSU.
CO., LTD., THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE CLUB ROAD, BELGAUM, REP. BY ITS OFFICE GE-PLAZA, AIR PORT ROAD, YARAWAD, PUNE …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAVINDRA R MANE, ADV FOR R2, R1-DECEASED)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD:25-08-2011, PASSED IN MVC.
NO.1558/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT AND DISTRICT JUDGE, FAST TRACK COURT-I, CHIKODI, ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12338 MFA No. 21555 of 2012
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, THE
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI)
Though notice was issued to respondent No.1, despite granting sufficient opportunity, the appellant has not taken steps against the owner of the vehicle, wherein, the Tribunal has fastened the liability against the owner i.e., respondent No.1 herein.
2. The appeal was filed in the year 2012. It seems that the appellant is not interested in taking steps against respondent No.1. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for not taking steps as the liability has been saddled against respondent No.1.
Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS CT: BSB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11