Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3741 (UTT)

SIDDHANT WADHWA v. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/424/2020 · 2025-06-05

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.424 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Vivek Kathait, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submits that after investigation charge sheet dated 10.10.2020 has been submitted against the petitioner, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 05.06.2025 SK