Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37402 (RAJ)

PHOOL CHAND @ KABBU SON OF SHRI BRIJMOHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3575/2025 · 2025-07-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27706] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3575/2025 1. Phool Chand @ Kabbu Son Of Shri Brijmohan, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Sherpur, Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur ( Raj). 2. Rakesh Son Of Shri Brijmohan, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Sherpur, Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur ( Raj). 3. Munna Son Of Shri Chhitar, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Sherpur, Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur ( Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Govind Paridwal Son Of Shri Gajanand Paridwal, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Bahravanda Khurd, Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Niwas Saini, Adv. Ms. Nirmala Kushwah, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 24/07/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer seeking quashing of FIR No.0101/2025, registered at Police Station Kundera, District Sawaimadhopur, for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 324(2), 352 of BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(VA) of SC/ST Act. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has furnished a factual report and has submitted that there are criminal antecedents registered [2025:RJ-JP:27706] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3575/2025] against the petitioner No.3. Further, it is submitted that investigation in the instant matter is ongoing. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are willing to join the investigation. 4. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that there are criminal antecedents registered against the petitioner No.3, this Court is of the opinion that matter requires investigation. Thus, petitioners are directed to co-operate in the investigation, whenever their presence is required and Investigating authorities are at liberty to proceed, in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 6. A copy of factual report dated 21.07.2025 is taken on record. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /25