Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2264 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Mahesh Raj …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 07.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith office order dated 29.09.2025 passed by Dy. Director of School Education (Ele.) Chamba, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Anish Banshtu, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with.
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Deputy Advocate General. Respondents, after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of judgment passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 1638 of 2024, titled as Mohit Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., have granted him benefit of higher pay scale on completion of two years regular service and in that regard, DDO has already been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrear subject to verification of his service as per Finance Department instructions issued from time to time subject to final outcome of the legal remedy in Mohit Sharma (supra).
3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that financial benefits flowing from the aforesaid compliance, if not already released, are released to the petitioner within three months from today.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 17, 2025 (sunil)