Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37393 (AP)

Kombattula Adi Narayanamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/2319/2018 · 2025-07-02

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

V' APHCOI0638862018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE n > a QC rr, Ojh PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2319 OF 2018 Between: Kombattula Adi Narayanamma, W/o.K.Jeeva Rathnam, aged about 48 years, Occ:Asst. Public Prosecutor, R/o.Flat No.512, Srinivasa Castle, Back side of Padmavathi Kalyanamantapam, Tiruchanur Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.PC aggrieved by the Orders, dated 05-07-2018 passed in Crl.MP.No.658 of 2018 in C.C.No.355 of 2017, on the file of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010638862018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT I THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2319/2018 Between: Kombattula Adi Narayanamma ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous as the main case i.e., C.C. No.355 of 2017 on the file of the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa, was ended in acquittal on 26.10.2018. 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTYREGISTRAR I c //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 2. The Station House Officer, Chinna Chowk Police Station, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 3. C^ne CC to Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] jl' ' ' ■ 4. two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 6. Three CD Copies BSV TAC HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 2319 OF 2018 of g’ ?! SEP2m‘i I ^ Cuitem seciion DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS