Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37392 (JHR)

PRAMILA DEVI v. PAPPU RAM

Acq. App.(C)/19/2025 · 2025-12-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:36909 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acq. Appeal (C) No. 19 of 2025 ------ Parmila Devi, aged about 41 years, daughter of late Basudeo Ram and wife of Rajesh Prasad, resident of Village-Sital Pur, P.O.-Sital Pur, P.S.- Giridih (M), Dist.-Girdih .... .... …. Appellant Versus 1. Pappu Ram, aged about 50 years, son of late Basudeo Ram, resident of Village-Sitalpur, P.O., P.S.-Giridih (M), Dist.- Giridih 2. Dipu Ram, aged about 35 years, son of late Basudeo Ram, resident of Village-Sitalpur, P.O., P.S.- Giridih (M), Dist.- Giridih 3. Niraj Ram, aged about 28 years, son of late Basudeo Ram, resident of Village-Sitalpur, P.O., P.S.- Giridih (M), Dist.- Giridih 4. Laxman @ Manoj Ram, son of late Basudeo Ram, resident of Village-Sitalpur, P.O., P.S.- Giridih (M), Dist.- Giridih 5. The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Ashish Kr. Advocate, Advocate For the Resp. No.5-State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. For Resp. Nos.1 to 4 : Mr. Mahesh Kr. Sinha (2), Advocate ------ Order No.07 Dated- 09.12.2025 I.A. No.3535 of 2024 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press this interlocutory application. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is rejected as not pressed. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Acq. Appeal (C) No. 19 of 2025 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this acquittal appeal to file an appeal before the learned Sessions Judge. This acquittal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09.12.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-