201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3397-1998 Date of decision: 03.05.2025 Joginder Kaur ...Appellant Versus Union of India and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1 (Through Video Conferencing) **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. The plaintiff-appellant had filed a suit for declaration to the effect that she was entitled to restoration of pension in the year 1993. Against the judgment of the trial Court as well as of the First Appellate Court, the present Regular Second Appeal was filed in which no stay order has been granted. 2. Notice was issued to the appellant as well as to her counsel. None has appeared on behalf of the appellant to state as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal or not. 3. Accordingly, the present Regular Second Appeal is disposed of at this stage with liberty to the appellant to revive the case in case any cause survives to her. 4. Registry is directed to send a copy of the present order to the appellant at the address given in the memo of parties. 03.05.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.05.03 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document