Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37384 (RAJ)

SANJEEV KUMAR NAGARWAL S/O SHRI LALARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2589/2025 · 2025-12-10

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50138] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.2589/2025 Sanjeev Kumar Nagarwal S/o Shri Lalaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Renwal Manji, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Superintendent Of Police, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan. 3. Deputy Superintendent Of Police/ C.o. Circle Phagi, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Renwal Manji, District Jaipur Rural, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/12/2025 1. By way of filing this criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Investigating Officer for making fair and impartial investigation in FIR No.18/2025 registered with Police Station Renwal Manji, District Jaipur (Rural) for the offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 351(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(h), 3(1)(j), 3(1)(o) of SC/ST (Prevention from Atrocities) Cases, 1989. 2. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court that after investigation of the matter, the Police has submitted final report negative, hence, under the changed circumstances, this misc. petition has been rendered infructuous. [2025:RJ-JP:50138] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2589/2025] 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) stand disposed of. 4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum of law for redressal of his grievances by way of filing appropriate application. 5. The factual report so furnished by learned Public Prosecutor is ordered to be retained on the record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/15