IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4601 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav son of Late Madhi Yadav @ Madho Yadav R/O Village - Tamganj, Ward no 3, P.S - Narpatganj, District - Araria 2. Jagdish Yadav son of Late Madho Yadav @ Madhi Yadav R/O Village - Tamganj, Ward no 3, P.S - Narpatganj, District - Araria 3. Suresh Yadav son of Late Madho Yadav @ Madhi Yadav R/O Village - Tamganj, Ward no 3, P.S - Narpatganj, District - Araria 4. Chhotu Yadav @ Prince Kumar S/O Jagdish Yadav R/O Village - Tamganj, Ward no 3, P.S - Narpatganj, District - Araria ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Nunulal Rishidev S/O late Vidyalay Rishidev R/O Village - Tamganj, Ward no 3, P.S - Narpatganj, District - Araria ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Arun, Advocate Mr. Md. Anwar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Pratyush, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 3 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant appeal has been preferred against the order dated 16.10.2025 passed in A.B.P no.1855 of 2025 by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Araria and for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint SC and ST Case no.103 of 2024 registered under sections 192(2), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 333, 303(2), 76, 64, 62, 352, 357, (2) & (3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 3(i), (ii), (viii), (x) and (xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4601 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the appellants submits that it is not in dispute that cognizance has been taken by the learned trial Court besides other sections also under section 3(i)(s) of the SC and ST Act. 4. In view of the fact and circumstances of the case, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the instant appeal to enable the appellant nos. 2, 3 and 4 to surrender in the learned Court below (appellant no.1 having already been arrested during pendency of the instant appeal) and to move an appropriate application for grant of regular bail. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, after some argument, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. In case the appellants so surrender within the aforesaid period and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of dismissal/withdrawal. Shiv/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T