211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3445-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision: February 06, 2025 Nazma and others … Appellants Versus Nazar Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellants. Ms. Farheen, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) There is no representa on on behalf of the appellants despite the fact that Mr. Hem Raj Kapil, Advocate, represen ng the appellants has been duly informed on his mobile number, as reported by the Registry. 2. A perusal of the file would reveal that the suit for specific performance filed by plain ff (respondent herein) was decreed by the trial Court on 23.04.1993. The appeal filed by the defendants (appellants herein) was dismissed by the First Appellate Court on 27.05.1998. The appellants- defendants have approached this Court by way of present regular second appeal against the concurrent findings of the Courts below. 3. As noted above, no body has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants to pursue the appeal. As such, present appeal is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecu on. February 06, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.02.06 16:40 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order