Shaik Ghouse Mohiuddin v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/39115/2014 · 2025-01-22
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37364 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37364 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010633342014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 39115/2014 Between: Shaik Ghouse Mohiuddin and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A M QURESHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP)
2. S ARIFULLAH (SC FOR AP WAQF BOARD) The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
22nd January, 2025 Knr
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.39115 of 2014 22nd January, 2025
knr