[2025:RJ-JP:2731] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 777/2025 Satyanarayan Sharma S/o Kalyan Mal, R/o B-21, Ekta Nagar, Ajmer Road, Dhawas, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur (At Present In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Gaur with Mr. Avi Airun For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/01/2025 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.960/2023 registered at Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. Vide order dated 27.11.2024, First Bail Application (No.13598/2024) was dismissed by this Court with liberty to renew the prayer of bail after submission of final result of investigation. Now charge-sheet has been filed. Thus, this second bail application has been preferred. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate. He is in custody since 20.10.2024 & there are no criminal antecedents against him. Charge-sheet has been filed and [2025:RJ-JP:2731] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-777/2025] trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and after thorough investigation, police has submitted charge-sheet; absence of criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the second bail application. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. This second bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Satyanarayan Sharma S/o Kalyan Mal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J DIVYA SAINI /66