Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3736 (CHH)

Smt. Parwati Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

ACQA/129/2016 · 2025-02-14

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 129 of 2016 Smt. Parwati Sahu Wd/o Late Chandra Prakash Sahu Aged About 57 Years Ocupation- Service Teacher, R/o Sector- 09, Road No. 37, Block 1/b, Bhilai, Civil And Revenue District Durg, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh ... Appellant Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh through The Station House Officer, Police Station; Supela, District: Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2. Beeram Bai W/o Shri Rakhubar Sahu, aged about 40 years R/o C/o 152/9, Road No. 06, Steel Colony, Supela, Civil and Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3. Kalyani Sahu W/o Shri Vedram Sahu, aged about 40 years R/o C/o 152/8, Road No.6, Steel Nagar, Supela, Civil and Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. Vedram Sahu S/o Shri Gyanu Ram Sahu, aged about 40 years R/o C/o 152/8, Road No.6, Steel Nagar, Supela, Civil and Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5. Bhola Ram Sahu S/o Late Raghuvar, aged about 32 years R/o C/o 152/9, Road No.6, Steel Colony, Supela, Civil and Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 6. Devki Sahu W/o Doctor Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, aged about 37 years R/o 2A, Street 27, Sector-8, Bhilai Nagar, Civil and Revenue ssDistrict : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents SAURABH YADAV Digitally signed by SAURABH YADAV Date: 2025.02.14 14:32:05 +0530 __________________________________________________________________ For Applicant : None. For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Pragya Pandey, Dy. G.A. For Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 : None. Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 14.02.2025 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant even when the case is called in the third round of hearing. 2. In the above circumstance, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for non- prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE JUDGE Saurabh