Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37357 (MAD)

N.SAKUNTHALA v. R.V.NATARAJAN (DECEASED) 1.R.V.Ravirajan and 4 others

A/3786/2024 · 2025-09-09

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 3786 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A No. 3786 of 2024 AND CS NO. 696 OF 2003 1. N.Sakunthala W/o.Nagarajan, No.2/1, Veera Kutty Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021. Applicant(s) Vs 1. R.V.NATARAJAN (DECEASED) 1.R.V.Ravirajan and 4 others S/o.Late R.Velusamy Nadar, Plot No.1294, I Block, 31st Street, Anna Nagar West, Chennai 600 040. 2.K.Kasthuri D/o.Late R.Velusamy Nadar, W/o.Kanniappan, Sunshine Apartments, Anna Nagar East, Chennai 600 102 3.Mrs.Mahalakshmi Natarajan W/o.Late R.V.Natarajan 4.N.Rakesh Balaji Both Sons of Late R.V.Natarajan, 3 to 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3786 of 2024 are residing at Plot No.1294, I Block, 31st Street, Anna Nagar West, Chennai 600 040. 5.N.Suresh Balaji S/o.Late R.V.Natarajan Respondent(s) PRAYER: Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules r/w. Order XXVI Rule I of CPC to appoint an Advocate Commissioner along with a chartered engineer to identify the divisibility of item 1 suit property and thereby file a report before this Honble Court. For Applicant(s): M/s.A.Palaniappan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vinod Advocate Commissioner Mr.D.R. Raghunath for D4 to D6 ORDER This application has been filed to appoint an Advocate Commissioner along with a Chartered Engineer to identify the divisibility of item 1 suit property and thereby file a report before this Court. 2. On 29.11.2024, this Court has appointed an Advocate Commissioner to file a report as to whether the Item No.1 of the suit schedule property is divisible or not with the assistance of the Charted Engineer. Thereafter, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3786 of 2024 Advocate Commissioner has filed his report on 27.03.2025. 3. When the matter is take up today the respondents 1, 3 to 5 have filed objection to the Commissioner's Report. Hence, this Court feels that the proceedings relating to the Advocate Commissioner can be closed. 4. It is learnt that the other application in A.No.3788/2024 was already closed on 22.11.2024 by giving liberty to the parties to reopen the same depeding upon the outcome of the O.S.A.Nos.99 & 100 / 2024 challenging the preliminary decree. 5. In the result, this application filed to appoint the Advocate Commissioner, is closed. 09-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3786 of 2024 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn A No. 3786 of 2024 AND CS NO. 696 OF 2003 09-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis