IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 SEEMA AND ANOTHER STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Manpreet Kaur (through V.C.) Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, A.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 19.03.2025 ( 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Respondents No.4 to 6 are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by them to kill her. She has left her h Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 19.03.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. 3. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: SEEMA AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for the (through V.C.) Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, A.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and to take action on dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P-4). It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Respondents No.4 to 6 are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by them to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 19.03.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2983 of 2025 Date of decision: 26.03.2025 …. Petitioners STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, A.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Respondents No.4 to 6 are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by them to ouse and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 19.03.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into of the the s their representation It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Respondents No.4 to 6 are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by them to ouse and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 19.03.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into Jyoti 2025.03.26 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2983 of 2025 4. Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, A.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him. 5. I have heard learned counsel for t State counsel and relationship as veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 U.T. Chandigarh to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P do the needful expeditiously. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. 26.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2983 of 2025 Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, A.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him. I have heard learned counsel for t State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the nctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-The Senior Superintendent of Police, U.T. Chandigarh to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated Annexure P-4) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated Annexure P-4) be sent to respondent No.2, do the needful expeditiously. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.2983 of 2025 -2- Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, A.P.P., U.T., Chandigarh, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned going into the question of legality of their well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the nctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of The Senior Superintendent of Police, U.T. Chandigarh to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No , accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is he petitioners as well as learned going into the question of legality of their well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the nctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of The Senior Superintendent of Police, U.T. Chandigarh to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated in accordance with law and also to take necessary A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated so as to enable him to It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the Jyoti 2025.03.26 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document