Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37343 (RAJ)

VISHRAM S/O SEDURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12187/2025 · 2025-11-25

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47659] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12186/2025 Suresh Chand S/o Lalluram, R/o Nangal Haripura Tan Bhandeda, Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12187/2025 Vishram S/o Seduram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nagal Haripura, Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal with Mr. Avdhesh Singh Tanwar Mr. Ritesh Jain with Ms. Poonam Rao & Mr. Ramdeo Arya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 25/11/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.363/2025 registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), District Dausa for the offence(s) punishable under [2025:RJ-JP:47659] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12186/2025] Section(s) 319(2), 318(4) & 61(2) B.N.S. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they are behind the bars since 07.09.2025. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely-Suresh Chand S/o Lalluram & Vishram S/o Seduram, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which [2025:RJ-JP:47659] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12186/2025] the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /40-41