APHC010633772008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 249 Between: Tiriveedhi Kesava Rao, Rayavarapu Narasimha Rao And Another and Others Counsel for the Appellant 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:- The Respondent No.1/ Accused was tried in C.C.No.408 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I.Act. Vide Judgment dated 08.08.2007, the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, acquitted the Accused under Section 255(1) Cr.P.C Against the said acquittal, the complainant preferred Appeal before this Court. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 249 OF 2008 AND Rayavarapu Narasimha Rao And Another and Others ...RESPODENT(S) Appellant: BALAJI MEDAMALLI Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: The Respondent No.1/ Accused was tried in C.C.No.408 of 2005 on the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I.Act. Vide Judgment dated dditional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, acquitted the Accused under Section 255(1) Cr.P.C of the said offence Against the said acquittal, the complainant preferred the present Appeal before this Court. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY ...APELLANT ...RESPODENT(S) The Respondent No.1/ Accused was tried in C.C.No.408 of 2005 on the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I.Act. Vide Judgment dated dditional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, of the said offence. the present Criminal 2. When the appeal has come up for hearing, learned counsel for the Appellant filed a Memo on behalf of the complainant stating that the Appellant had requested the learned counsel vide letter dated 09.04.2025 to withdraw the present appeal on the ground that he is not pressing the said Appeal any further. 3. In view of the aforesaid reasons, the Criminal Appeal No. 249 of 2008 is dismissed as not pressed. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ K SREENIVASA REDDY,J Date 09.04.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 249 OF 2008 09.04.2025 KK