Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37342 (PNJ)

ANAND PARKASH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CWP/8363/2000 · 2025-07-09

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-8363-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 Anand Parkash ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Ms. Bhagyashri, Advocate for Mr. Vibhav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate for the respondent-HSAMB. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is assailing his compulsory retirement and claiming retirement benefits. 2. Ms. Bhagyashri, Advocate submits that petitioner passed away on 11.01.2018. The respondent did not release petitioner’s service benefits. 3. Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate submits that all the service/retiral benefits of the petitioner has already been released to petitioner or his wife. 4. In the wake of statement of Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate, the petition stands disposed of. PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.09 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8363-2000 (O&M) -2- 5. The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 09.07.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.09 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document