ARADHANA ANDOTRA v. STATE TH.REVENUE DEPTT.AND ORS.
OWP/858/2018 · 2025-03-04
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3734 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3734 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case No. :- OWP No. 858/2018
Aradhana Andotra …..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate.
Vs
State and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 04.03.2025
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority under law. In the light of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, which is taken on record, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge JAMMU 04.03.2025 Ram Krishan
S.No. 41 Ram Krishan 2025.03.06 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document