Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37339 (PNJ)

SUPINDER KAUR v. THE PANJAB UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS

CWP/8100/2025 · 2025-03-24

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-8100-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 126 CWP-8100-2025 Date of Decision: 24.03.2025 Supinder Kaur ......Petitioner(s) Versus The Panjab University and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate, for the respondent-University. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of show cause notice dated 16.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) whereby she has been called upon to show cause as to why action should not be taken against her. 2. The petitioner claims that she has filed reply to show cause notice as well as representation to higher authorities but to no avail. Neither the Chairman of the Department is passing order nor higher authorities are looking into the grievance. 3. Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate, who on advance notice is present in court, submits that as per his instructions, the matter has been referred to Standing Committee to resolve the dispute. Shivani Gupta 2025.03.25 10:46 CWP-8100-2025 2 4. Faced with this, Mr. Kshitiz Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition. 5. Disposed of as not pressed. 24.03.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.03.25 10:46