Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37331 (RAJ)

ROHITASH S/O BHOLARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8613/2025 · 2025-10-28

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43282] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8613/2025 1. Rohitash S/o Bholaram, R/o Nandera, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa (Raj.). 2. Monu S/o Bholaram, R/o Nandera, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa (Raj.). 3. Manish S/o Rajulal, R/o Nandera, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya UR Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Narendra Kumar Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 112/2025 registered at Police Station Bandikui District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 351(2), 352 BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that vide order dated 27.08.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicants subject to the condition that applicants join investigation. In compliance of the same, the applicants joined investigation. 3. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for the complainant has further submitted that accused-applicants are continuously threatening complainant for compromise and withdrawing the matter. [2025:RJ-JP:43282] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8613/2025] 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicants have already joined investigation as directed vide interim order dated 27.08.2025 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 27.08.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Bandikui District Dausa in FIR No. 112/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants 1. Rohitash S/o Bholaram, 2. Monu S/o Bholaram, and 3. Manish S/o Rajulal, shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade themselves from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (iv) that in the event of non-compliance of the aforesaid conditions, complainant is at liberty to revive the order of present bail application after reflecting tangible evidences. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /236