Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37324 (CHH)

UMESH SONI v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/8694/2025 · 2025-08-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:38652 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8694 of 2025 1 - Umesh Soni S/o Padmohan Soni Aged About 61 Years Occup. Ass. Grade-3, In The Department of Education Jashpur, At Present R/o Village- Dokda, Post- Dokda, Tehsil - Kansabel, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantrlaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector District Jashpur, Collector Office Campus, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer District- Jashpur (C.G.) 4 - Block Education Officer Block- Kanabel, District- Jashpur, (C.G.) 5 - Principal Government Higher Secondary School Devri, Block- Kansabel, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 05-08-2025 1. Challenge in this petition is the order of transfer dated 30.06.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Devri, Block Kansabel to Chhichhali ‘A’, Block Bagicha. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the transfer order the petitioner wants to make representation before the transfer committee. Therefore, he may be permitted to make representation before the concerned authority. Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the documents annexed with the petition. 4. As per Clause 8 of the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, there is in-house remedy for making representation against the transfer order before the transfer committee who will consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. Clause 8 of the said transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 is reproduced as below: “8. स्थानांतरण से व्यथिथत शासकीय सेवक द्वारा अपने स्थानांतरण के विवरूद्ध अभ्यावेदन के वल स्थानांतरण नीतित के उल्लंघन होने पर ही उक्त उल्लंघन होने वाले कं ति$का के संबंध में स्पष्ट आधारों के साथ स्थानांतरण आदेश जारी होने की तितथिथ से 15 विदवस के भीतर प्रश्नाधीन स्थानांतरण आदेश की प्रतित सविहत शासन द्वारा गवि1त वरिरष्ठ सति4वों की सविमतित के संयोजक एवं सति4व, सामान्य प्रशासन विवभाग को प्रस्तुत विकया जा सके गा। सविमतित द्वारा ऐसे प्रकरणों का इस स्थानांतरण नीतित के प्रकाश में परीक्षण करने के पश्चात अपनी अनुशंसा संबतिधत विवभाग को प्रेवि=त की जाएगी।” 5. Be that as it may, since in-house remedy has been provided to the employee concerned to raise the grievances before the transfer committee against transfer order, this court deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to move fresh representation before the transfer committee along with copy of this order within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the transfer committee, in turn, shall take a decision on the representation so made by the petitioner in accordance with law in an objective manner and pass a reasoned order on its own merits within a further period of two weeks. 6. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today to the said transfer committee. 7. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil