Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:57139 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 12605 of 2025 Applicant :- Wasimuddin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Muqeem Ansari,Mohd. Akbar Shah Alam Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to direct the trial court to accept the two surety in all the three cases, first case is Case Crime no. 398 of 2014 under Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, PS- Jansath, District Muzaffarnagar, second case is case crime no. 160 of 2012 under Section 3/8 Cow Slaughter Act, PS- Jansath, District Muzaffarnagar, third case is Case Crime no. 284 of 2013 u/s 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, PS- Jansath, District Muzaffarnagar, all the cases pertains to same Police Station- Jansath, District- Muzaffarnagar. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant sought the direction of this Court in shape of instructing the trial court to permit two sureties for all three cases wherein, applicant has already been enlarged on bail. 4. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant application. 5. During the course of argument a precise query has been raised before learned counsel for applicant that whether applicant has ever preferred the bail bond in pursuance to the aforesaid cases wherein he has been enlarged on bail and if so, whether there is a specific denial from learned trial court in shape of asking separate sureties for separate cases. In response to the query, learned counsel for applicant fairly submitted that applicant never preferred any bail bond in pursuance to any of aforesaid cases in which he has been enlarged on bail and there is no specific denial from learned trial court concerned. 6. In view of aforementioned discussions and after perusing the records, this Court finds that no prejudice has been caused to the applicant as applicant never intended to prefer bail bonds in pursuance to bail orders dated 13.02.2025 passed by learned court concerned and as such there is hardly any denial available in record with regard to two surety in each and ever case. Hence, no cause of action arises in favour of applicant to pursue the instant application which is pre-mature. 7. The instant application stands dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Shaswat Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad