SURENDRA KUMAR DABRA S/O SH. MURARILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6871/2025 · 2025-11-14
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37307 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37307 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45989] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6871/2025 Surendra Kumar Dabra S/o Sh. Murarilal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o House No.550/32, 20 Foot Road, Jawahar Jadughar Colony, Ajmer Currently Residing At Quarter No.1988, Fazer Road, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Ashok Harjani S/o Sh. Ramchandra Harjani, R/o House No. 33/34, A Gali No.2, Baldev Nagar, Makedwali Road, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurpreet Sodhi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Chandra Shekhar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 14/11/2025
1. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made to quash the FIR No.73/2022 registered with Police Station Kotwali Ajmer, District Ajmer registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B IPC.
2. Counsels for the parties submit that after registration of aforesaid FIR, the complainant has entered into a compromise with the petitioner and now, he does not want to prosecute the petitioner. Counsels submit that the complainant has appeared before the concerned authority for verification of compromise between the parties and the concerned authority has verified the factum of compromise between them. Counsel submits that under
[2025:RJ-JP:45989] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6871/2025] the changed circumstances and in light of the compromise between the parties, the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR be quashed. In support of their contentions, they have placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688 and submit that the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR be quashed.
3. Thus, in the view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties and applying the principles of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 BNSS.
4. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed. Proceedings arising out of impugned FIR No.73/2022 registered with Police Station Kotwali, Ajmer, District Ajmer registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B IPC, against the petitioner stands quashed and set-aside.
5. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/64