Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37304 (PNJ)

ASHIMA CHAND v. AMIT AGGARWAL

CR/1817/2025 · 2025-05-22

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 CR-1817-2025 Date of Decision:22.05.2025 ASHIMA CHAND ...PETITIONER VERSUS AMIT AGGARWAL ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Counsel for the petitioner/defendant states that application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2, CPC, by the respondent/plaintiff is pending. She has made a reference to the interim orders passed by the Trial Court to state that the application has not been decided for the last almost one year. She requests that a direction be issued to the Trial Court to dispose off the application in a time bound manner. 2. Noticing the nature of prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not deem it necessary to call upon the respondent. As the application, Annexure P-4, filed by respondent/plaintiff is pending, Trial Court shall make an endeavour and decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. 3. Petition is disposed off. 22.05.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.05.23 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh