PARVEZ AKHTAR @ SONU S/O MOHD. RAFIQ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12954/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37302 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37302 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44048] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12954/2025 Parvez Akhtar @ Sonu S/o Mohd. Rafiq, R/o Sanjay Nagar Badi, Bhimpura Dhakadkhedi, P.s. Kaithun, District Kota (Raj.) (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Sanjay Khan HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 03/11/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.391/2025 registered at Police Station Udoyognagar (Kota City), District-Kota City for offences under Sections 109(1), 308(5), 324(4), 333, 115(2) and 3(5) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submitted that neither the name of the petitioner mentioned in the FIR nor any specific act been attributed to him. Though the injured, Somya Sharma @ Ajruddin, has sustained life-threatening injuries, the said injuries have been attributed to the co-accused Sharuk and Talib. Petitioners are behind the bars since 11.09.2025 without
[2025:RJ-JP:44048] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12954/2025] any criminal past. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Parvez Akhtar @ Sonu S/o Mohd. Rafiq shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/101