RATHORE CHAND @ SAMMI @ ASLAM MOHAMMAD S/O ANGREJCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11015/2025 · 2025-10-03
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40117] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11015/2025 Rathore Chand @ Sammi @ Aslam Mohammad S/o Angrejchand, Aged About 43 Years, R/o H.no. - 157, K H No. 27/20/1, Udai Vihar Nangloi, Paschim Delhi Presently Residing At Bai Police Station Chainani, District Udhampur, Jammu Kashmir. (Accused Presently Confined At District Jail, Khairthal-Tijara) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 03/10/2025
1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Rathore Chand @ Sammi @ Aslam Mohammad S/o Angrejchand, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.36/2025 dated 04.06.2025 registered at P.S. Mahila Thana, Khairthal- Tijara for the offence under Sections 64(2)(m), 303(2), 319(2), 87 and 352 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not
[2025:RJ-JP:40117] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11015/2025] have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
3.
Learned counsel for applicant-accused submits that the age of the present petitioner is 43 years whereas age of the prosecutrix is 39 years and both are adult persons. He further submits that prosecutrix and present petitioner are known to each other for last 4-5 years and after elopement of victim with present petitioner on 03.03.2025 a missing report was registered after three months and FIR was registered on 04.06.2025. He further submitted that during inquiry, on missing report, victim was recovered and in her statement she has made it clear that she has voluntarily left her home with present petitioner. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and a false report is registered by the husband of prosecutrix, therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant-accused. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On 04.06.2025 complainant prosecutrix has lodged a report about incident of kidnapping and rape from 03.03.2025. After registration of a case the statement of prosecutrix were recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of BNSS. Present accused-petitioner was arrested on 04.06.2025. The age of
[2025:RJ-JP:40117] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11015/2025] prosecutrix is 39 years and present petitioner is 43 years, there is no criminal antecedents against the present petitioner. 7. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicant- accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Rathore Chand @ Sammi @ Aslam Mohammad S/o Angrejchand, is hereby allowed and the applicant- accused is ordered to be released on bail with condition that applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. [2025:RJ-JP:40117] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11015/2025]
9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J ashu/30