2025:JHHC:35896 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6779 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6779 of 2025 ---- Priyanshu Singh, aged about 24 years, son of Arun Singh, HIG 43, Housing Colony, PO – GPO, PS – Dhanbad, District – Dhanbad .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Advocate ---- 04/01.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with, Chutia P.S Case No. 186 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/336(2)/338/340(2)/3(5) of B.N.S, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the employee of the company namely PL Solution Pvt. Ltd. He further submits that the allegations are made that the informant was appointed as data operator in the said company and certain security amount has been deposited and later on he has left the job and the security amount has not been returned by the company and on this background the F.I.R. has been registered. He then submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.21 of the petition. He next submits that in identical situation one co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.5783 of 2025:JHHC:35896 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6779 of 2025 2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegation of not returning the security amount is there. 5. Considering that the petitioner is the employee of company namely PL Solution Pvt. Ltd. and for not returning of the security deposit by the Company the petitioner is implicated in the case and further the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.21 of the petition and in identical situation one co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A., I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Chutia P.S Case No. 186 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 01.12.2025 Sangam/