Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37300 (ALL)

BABITA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/4673/2025 · 2025-07-02

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:104141 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4673 of 2025 Petitioner :- Babita Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kulveer Singh,Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sujeet Kumar Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following relief:- (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent no. 3 to take final decision in pursuance of the application moved by petitioner dated 10.3.2025, within specified period as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents Authority to conclude the enquiry against the respondent no. 6 namely Smt. Sumanjeet Kaur, in pursuance of the letter dated 11.03.2025, issued by respondent no. 4 in respect of conducting an inquiry against respondent no. 6 within specified period as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Sujeet Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no. 6 and Sri Awadhesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has made an application dated 10.3.2025 before respondent no. 3, which is still pending. He prayed that respondent no. 3 may be directed to decide the application dated 10.3.2025 of the petitioner within a time bound manner. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 3, in advance notice, vehemently opposed the present writ petition but has not opposed the innocuous prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 6 also opposed the writ petition. 6. Taking into consideration of the entirety of the matter without entering into the merit of the case, I am inclined to allow innocuous prayer made by the petitioner. Respondent no. 3, is directed to decide the application of the petitioner which is already pending expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 S.K.S. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad