UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (FINANCE) v. LATEEF AHMAD MOCHI AND ORS.
LPA/26/2025 · 2026-03-04
Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 373 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 373 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 15 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(545/2025) IN LPA 26/2025
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
LATEEF AHMAD MOCHI AND ORS.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. B. A. Misri, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER 04.03.2026
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that sanction was granted for filing Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) against the Judgement passed in WP(C) no. 2125/2022 titled Gulzar Ahmad Dar and Ors vs. UT of JK and Ors. and WP(C) no. 963/2022 titled Latief Ahmad Mochi and Ors vs. UT of JK and others. Respondents have submitted that they have complied with the Judgement and arrears of wages have also been given. This apart, he has placed on record a copy of the order dated 09.12.2025, in which appellants have stated that due to subsequent development, the application along with LPA no. 22/2025 has become infructuous. With the same conditions, the instant application along with the Appeal is also rendered infructuous and is accordingly dismissed.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 04.03.2026
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 05.03.2026 10:31