Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37294 (JHR)

EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE M v. PRESIDING OFFICER And ORS

WPC/2290/2001 · 2025-10-29

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(L) No. 2290 of 2001 -- Employers in relation to the Management of Chasnalla Colliery of M/s. Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., At and P.O. Chasnalla, District Dhanbad ..Petitioner Versus 1. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad 2. Their Workmen represented by Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union, having its office at Temple Road, Purana Bazar, Dhanbad, P.S and District Dhanbad 3. Union of India ..Respondents -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Indrajit Sinha, Arpan Mishra, Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocates For the Respondent No.2 : M/s. Kalyan Banerjee, Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocates -- 29/20.11.2025 The instant application has been listed today on mentioning pointing out that due to typographical error in the order dated 29.10.2025 passed in W.P(L) No. 2290 of 2001; wherein the case was argued by learned counsel for the petitioner, M/s. Indrajit Sinha, Arpan Mishra, and Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocates and learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 M/s. Kalyan Banerjee and Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocates, but the same have wrongly been typed as “For the Petitioner : Mrs. M.M.Pal, Sr. Advocate and Mrs. Mouha Palit, Advocate and For the Respondent: Mr. Sachi Nandan Das”. 2. Accordingly, the order dated 29.10.2025 passed in W.P(L) No. 2290 of 2001 be read as “For the Petitioner: M/s. Indrajit Sinha, Arpan Mishra and Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocates and For the Respondent No. 2: M/s. Kalyan Banerjee and Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocates. 2 3. The order dated 29.10.2025 is modified to the aforesaid extent. 4. Let this order be treated as part of the order dated 29.10.2025. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 20th November, 2025 Jk