EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE M v. PRESIDING OFFICER And ORS
WPC/2290/2001 · 2025-10-29
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37294 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37294 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(L) No. 2290 of 2001
-- Employers in relation to the Management of Chasnalla Colliery of M/s. Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., At and P.O. Chasnalla, District Dhanbad
..Petitioner
Versus
1. Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad
2. Their Workmen represented by Bihar Colliery Kamgar Union, having its office at Temple Road, Purana Bazar, Dhanbad, P.S and District Dhanbad
3. Union of India
..Respondents
--
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Indrajit Sinha, Arpan Mishra,
Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocates For the Respondent No.2 : M/s. Kalyan Banerjee, Ajay Kumar
Singh, Advocates
--
29/20.11.2025
The instant application has been listed today on mentioning pointing out that due to typographical error in the
order dated 29.10.2025 passed in W.P(L) No. 2290 of 2001; wherein the case was argued by learned counsel for the petitioner, M/s. Indrajit Sinha, Arpan Mishra, and Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocates and learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 M/s. Kalyan Banerjee and Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocates, but the same have wrongly been typed as
“For the Petitioner : Mrs. M.M.Pal, Sr. Advocate and Mrs. Mouha Palit, Advocate and For the Respondent: Mr. Sachi Nandan Das”.
2.
Accordingly, the order dated 29.10.2025 passed in W.P(L) No. 2290 of 2001 be read as “For the Petitioner: M/s. Indrajit Sinha, Arpan Mishra and Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocates and For the Respondent No. 2: M/s. Kalyan Banerjee and Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocates.
2
3.
The order dated 29.10.2025 is modified to the aforesaid extent.
4.
Let this order be treated as part of the order dated 29.10.2025.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
20th November, 2025
Jk