Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37293 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA PRASAD JAIN S/O SH. PARAS CHAND JAIN v. SMT. DAZY ARYA W/O SH. SANDEEP SHARMA D/O SH. JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA

CW/3898/2021 · 2025-10-08

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40928] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3898/2021 1. Rajendra Prasad Jain S/o Sh. Paras Chand Jain, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Mohalla Hindu Para, Alwar, Currently R/o House No. A-48, Hasan Kha Mewati Nagar, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar. Tenant Shopkeeper, Shop Manni Ka Bar, Alwar, Partner Business M/s Rajasthan Book Depo, Manni Ka Bar, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar (Raj.) 2. Ramesh Chand Jain S/o Sh. Paras Chand Jain, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Mohalla Hindu Para, Alwar, Currently R/o House No. 276, Scheme No. 3, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar. Tenant Shopkeeper, Shop Manni Ka Bar, Alwar, Partner Business M/s Rajasthan Book Depo, Manni Ka Bar, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar (Raj.) 3. Pradeep Jain S/o Sh. Ramesh Chand Jain, Aged About 42 Years, R/o House No. 276, Scheme No. 3, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar. C/o M/s Rajasthan Book Depo, Manni Ka Barr, Alwar, Tehsil And District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus Smt. Dazy Arya W/o Sh. Sandeep Sharma D/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o House No. 49, Moti Dongri, Alwar Currently R/o House No. 82, Apna Ghar Shalimar Extension, Alwar Tehsil And District Alwar. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 08/10/2025 1. Matter comes up on an application (IA No. 1/2025) filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India [2025:RJ-JP:40928] (2 of 2) [CW-3898/2021] seeking withdrawal of the writ petition on the ground that it has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has indeed become infructuous. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the present civil writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, having been rendered infructuous. 5. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/62