[2025:RJ-JP:2635-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 665/2025 Dr. Sumer Singh Solanki Son Of Shri Vijay Singh Solanki, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of A-1 Agrasen Colony Behind New Kotwali Jhalawar Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules Division), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Dy. Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Director, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Kumar Garg. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Ms. Sunita Meena. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 20/01/2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this petition has also been considered and decided by the Co- ordinate Bench of this court in the matter of Dr. Deepti Gupta & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition [2025:RJ-JP:2635-DB] (2 of 3) [CW-665/2025] No.18258/2024 decided on 03.12.2024, wherein the following order was passed:- “1.After the order was passed by this Court earlier on 20.09.2024 in another petition, new developments have been brought to the notice of this Court, one of them regarding dismissal of the Review Petition by the Hon’ble Supreme Court filed in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma on 15.10.2024 as stated at the bar by learned counsel for the petitioners. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioners has also placed before this Court order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The State of Rajashtan & Ors. Vs. Pyare Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C)No.10560/2024), wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clarified that there is no stay on the judgment of the High Court and further that in the event the outstanding towards salary has not been paid, the same shall be cleared within a period of one week. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that Petitioner No. 1 will retire from service on 31.12.2024 and Petitioner No. 2 will retire from service on 28.02.2025. 3.In view of the above developments, we need not keep this petition pending and same is also finally disposed off in terms of order passed earlier by this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13496/2021), decided on 13.07.2022. The petitioners will been titled to the same relief as was granted in the aforesaid cases meaning thereby, the petitioners are entitled to continue in service with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits upto the age of 62 years.” Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents has not disputed the submission made by counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:2635-DB] (3 of 3) [CW-665/2025] In that view of the matter, this writ petition stands disposed of in view of the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this court in the matter of Dr. Deepti Gupta & Anr. (supra). (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/54