Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3729 (ORI)

ANIL KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF ORISSA

WP(C)/31314/2025 · 2026-02-13

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.31314 of 2025 Anil Kumar Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. M. Bhuyan, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Behera, ASC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 13.02.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that your Lordships be graciously pleased to admit writ appeal and issue notice to the Opp. Parties to file show cause as to 4 a) Why a direction will not be given to op no 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner vide Annexure within a stipulated period and to sanction ACP as well as revision of pension along with all arrear financial benefits as per Govt. in H&U D. Department Resolution in favour of the petitioner within a stipulated period. And if the opposite parties do not show cause then the rule be made absolute by issuing appropriate order/direction to the opposite parties and any other order as deem fit be passed p. 2 p. 2 And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti